pull down to refresh

IMO, a well designed game shouldn't settle into a stable meta / Nash equilibrium for long. Once one approach to the game becomes too dominant, some other approach should be able to counter it and begin to ascend.

That’s probably what we’ll see.

He makes the point that chaos implies large differences from small changes, so even just roster changes will impact the equilibrium.

What I thought was interesting is that this is the first time in NBA history that the expected value of threes and twos has been roughly equal and it’s because they’ve found something like a mixed strategy equilibrium.

reply