It's great! The math is beyond me atm, but it reads really well.

I wrote a note about an inconsistency in how moderation was portrayed, but when I went back to verify it, I had misread an earlier sentence. So I don't have anything on that front.

I continue to suspect there are a lot more hypotheses one could have but they don't come easily to me. One thing that comes up a lot when @Scoresby and I discuss SN is financial vs status (intrinsic) motivations, but there's no way to test that with the data we have afaict.

Anyway, I think outsiders are going to have the most interesting feedback, so I can't wait to hear that.

Now I get to brag about being a coauthor on an economics paper! Congrats and thank you!