I'm genuinely worried about it.  I submitted the paper on SSRN (not peer reviewed, but i think they do a basic check to see if seems scientifically serious), and it's been sitting under review for much longer than I'm used to for SSRN

From my very unrepresentative experience, that bias is very strong.

Undisciplined

I mean, it's my job, and I could probably get a publication out of it, depending on how much previous work has been done in it, and how much anti-bitcoin bias and anti-small-platform bias there is within academia (which I will probably test soon with that other paper)