pull down to refresh
- Gamble that between OpenAI and Anthropic, one winner takes it all and then we have no choice but to pay 20x current cost for inference? (~ $5k a month)
Wild! $5k a month with wage growth being flat since the 1970s
Was listening to a podcast about the Radium Girls and they made $3.25 a day for making about 250 watches which adjusted for inflation equals about $95!
I think people would pay for AI if they could afford it but the mass majority can’t.
Even with massive government contracts the revenues must continue to grow to justify all of this spend.
reply
the revenues must continue to grow
Most importantly the losses need to shrink. There will be one big suck; their IPO. But Nvidia needs to get some ROI too, per #1447738:
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said the company's recent $30 billion investment in OpenAI "might be the last time" it invests in the artificial intelligence startup before it could go public toward the end of the year.
Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but to me it screams: burning more money would be reckless. IPO quick. Give us returns.
reply
The grim conclusion:
So let's for a moment assume that this is all there is to it. What's the hedge to enable oneself to keep capabilities? Ordered by cost estimate.
Isn't it amazing how the "pleb solution" costs $40k?