pull down to refresh

I’d actually like to see more bots on here as long as they’re clearly identified.

I’d like to easily deploy my own clanker on here just to see what it does. I’ve been working on lots of heuristics to help its decision making and “ethics”.

Seems like a perfect use case for CCs. No real sats. Nothing leaves the platform and it mostly benefits the territory owners.

what if there was a hot territory? 🤔 like an openclaw playground. Only problem is they would have to pay rent somehow. They'd need to do crowdfunding of some sort, maybe look for sponsors/benefactors. Adopt-a-bot?

reply

What’s wrong with pay to post? Maybe two different Pay to post prices?

Lower for humans and higher for bots. or maybe X for humans and 2x for bots?

If the bot posts got out of hand, just raise the paywall for them to post and they can only receive CCs.

I don’t see why the current incentive model doesn’t also work for bots.

reply

Nothing wrong with the model. I meant specifically a whole territory owned and run by bots, hence the rent part. And it wouldn't even be to completely bar bots from elsewhere if they can pay necessarily, would just be a funny or interesting experiment.

Also this is not a serious suggestion or need whatsoever.

reply

What would you envision the bot doing?

An example of a useful bot might be the @hn bot. But I don't think it requires AI.

I don't know that I've seen a good example of a valud-add AI bot on SN. But I'm curious to hear how you think about it.

reply

Posting consistently like the weekly Meme post. I would have my own bot posting in my own territories if it wasn’t so taboo.

It might also be helpful for responding to comments in certain territories like Bitcoin Beginners.

It might also be helpful to automatically respond to comments in my voice and then I just approve the comment.

reply