pull down to refresh

I am not generally supportive of higher taxes, but I have to acknowledge when people on my side of the political aisle present facts in a way that is distortionary.

Today I came across this Notthebee article, with this breathless headline,

Massachusetts Introduced Millionaire Tax In 2023, Immediately Lost $4.2 Billion In Income As People Fled The StateMassachusetts Introduced Millionaire Tax In 2023, Immediately Lost $4.2 Billion In Income As People Fled The State

It is actually a secondhand article of this one from Bloomberg. The following text is quoted in the NotTheBee article:

Residents exiting Massachusetts took a net of $4.2 billion in adjusted gross income with them in 2023, one of the largest totals in the country, after a tax on millionaires took effect.

The amount was an 8% year-over-year increase, according to Internal Revenue Service data, even as the total number of taxpayers leaving the state slowed.

This was the first year that residents were subject to a 4% surtax on incomes over $1 million after voters approved the levy in 2022 to fund schools and transportation.

Along with this chart:

Clearly, the article is meant to give the impression that the policy was a total failure.

But the picture is more mixed, as per the original Bloomberg article:

Supporters of the Massachusetts measure hail the more than $6 billion in revenue it’s brought to state coffers. Critics warn that it’s driving away entrepreneurs, even if Massachusetts lacks the high-profile departures seen in California, which is weighing a wealth tax, or Washington, which enacted a millionaire tax earlier this month.

Despite the tax’s implementation, the number of residents moving out of Massachusetts who reported income of $200,000 or more — the top bracket tracked in the IRS data — fell year-over-year. Net outflows from Massachusetts long predate the millionaires tax, especially to Florida and New Hampshire, its northern neighbor, which has no tax on wages or capital gains. Total lost income was also higher in 2021 than 2023.

The state’s millionaires-tax collections have increased every year since 2023 and so far in fiscal 2026 have jumped 19% year-over-year to $1.3 billion.

So, in terms increasing the state's tax revenues, the policy is actually working, and net outflows of upper middle class residents has been falling. Moreover, the exodus of millionaires preceded the implementation of the tax.

According to some metrics, then, the tax is actually achieving its intended purposes. Obviously, there may be long run consequences if the state becomes a bad environment to do/start business in, but we need to acknowledge the supporters' own metrics if we want to understand the full contours of the debate.

Anyway, I guess some people would say that NotTheBee is not a serious site to begin with. Fair enough, but a lot of people do get their news entirely from sites like this, and it annoys me when one-sided, unnuanced views get perpetuated, regardless of which political camp it's coming from.


P.S. One reason I am especially frustrated is because I almost shared this article from the perspective of "Ha Ha look how dumb Massachusetts is!" But I caught myself and decided to read the original Bloomberg article, and found that the full story is more nuanced.

The world is much easier to navigate when people don't actually think about what they are saying (or sharing).

I fear that the amount of mis-stated or misinterpreted data is probably a pretty high percent of what all of us read and believe I'm any given day.

I know that I have had this exact experience where I am about to share something with a certain amount of glee, but then look in to of and discover that the picture is rather less clear than I thought.

Appreciate the reminder to check before I share.

reply
mis-stated or misinterpreted data is probably a pretty high percent of what all of us read and believe

This has always been the case.

Just think back to whenever you were at an event that the "News" reported.

reply

yep I'm sure we're all guilty of it at one time or another

reply
net outflows of upper middle class residents has been falling

That is probably meaningless in this context, though, as there will be far more people in the $200k-$999k range than in the $1M+ range.

reply

I think it matters for the pop-level discourse. A progressive might say something like, "well good, all the filthy millionaires are leaving, and the middle class, the people we care about, is growing", or something like that.

reply

Sure, it's just that no one is claiming the middle class fleeing, so showing that they aren't isn't a counterpoint to anything.

reply
a lot of people do get their news entirely from sites like this, and it annoys me when one-sided, unnuanced views get perpetuated, regardless of which political camp it's coming from.

Yeah, we dumb. Gotta stop paying attention to clicky shit, whether from serious outlets or less serious ones

reply

Tendremos que probar esta app veremos que sucede

5 sats \ 0 replies \ @035736735e 25 Mar -100 sats

Yes there was a large net outflow of income
Yes wealthy people have been leaving Massachusetts and similar states for years
Yes that trend is relevant to any conversation about tax policy

But at the same time
The number of higher earners leaving actually went down year over year
Outflows predate the tax and are heavily tied to Florida and New Hampshire which offer obvious tax advantages regardless
Total lost income was higher in 2021 than in 2023
And most importantly the new tax is bringing in billions in revenue and those receipts are growing

Both stories exist at the same time
There is real competitive pressure between states on tax and business climate
And the Massachusetts millionaire tax is simultaneously generating a lot of money for programs that voters said they wanted to fund

You can argue that this is bad long term policy that it may hollow out the future tax base or hurt the states ability to attract entrepreneurs
You can also argue that the tradeoff is worth it if the revenue goes to productive uses like infrastructure and education that themselves help long run growth

Those are serious arguments
What is not serious is pretending that one IRS data point settles everything and then framing it as If you believe in this tax you are just ignoring math

the methodological issue is real: taxable income drop captures avoidance behavior and income shifting, not necessarily people leaving. the $4.2B is real. attributing it entirely to exit requires residency data. two different claims collapsed into one headline.