Iran and Iraq were once the nation of Persia. The British/west broke Persia up in order to better be able to divide and rule over the different religious groups and factions within this oil rich region. The nation state boundaries of the entire middle east and Africa have been drawn up by the power brokers of Europe and the US on order to gain resource hegemony. The nation state and its power projection capacity is the primary determinant of the wealth of nations.
I would understand major combat operations as boots on the ground. This just seems like some strategic missile strikes and encouraging people of Iran to take over. we'll see, things can always escalate.
Trump is pushing back against China by attacking its client state- oil suppliers. Venezuela now Iran. China won the trade war- but USA is pushing back with war on Chinas energy supply and military proxies. Nation state power projection is fundamental to the wealth of nations. 'Free trade' is an oxymoron.
The geopolitical environment has shifted dramatically. Reports indicate that U.S. and Israeli forces have initiated military action against Iran, and there is credible speculation that this could evolve into a sustained campaign rather than a symbolic strike. Markets are not only reacting to shock but to the possibility of prolonged conflicta distinction with significant implications.
Historically, when geopolitical events extend over days or weeks, capital markets begin pricing in duration risk. This is different from short-term volatility and often triggers structural adjustments across asset classes.
We can outline three potential scenarios:
Limited Engagement Both sides conduct targeted strikes, claim strategic victories, and tensions gradually ease. Markets recover after initial volatility.
2.Prolonged Escalation The conflict draws in greater U.S. involvement, affecting oil production, shipping routes, inflation expectations, and defense spending. Broader macro uncertainty leads to sustained selling pressure.
3.Severe Disruption Iran interferes with traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, which channels roughly 20 percent of global oil supply. Any disruption would cause a rapid spike in crude prices, driving inflation higher and forcing interest rates upward.
In the severe disruption scenario, rising oil prices would reignite inflation fears. Increased yields could tighten liquidity conditions quickly. Risk assets including high multiple technology stocks, speculative growth names, small caps, and cryptocurrencies would likely face sharp declines.
In such scenarios, markets do not fall because fundamentals evaporate overnight but because leveraged positions must be unwound. Bitcoin, for example, would not decline due to structural failure in its network but because it is treated as a high-beta risk asset. When liquidity contracts, investors sell what they can, not necessarily what they want to.
Current price action already reflects this risk premium. Brent crude is approaching multi-month highs, and shipping costs for Middle East tanker routes have risen sharply. These are early indicators that markets are preparing for possible disruption.
The bottom line: if the conflict remains short-lived, markets may stabilize. If it escalates or disrupts Hormuz, we could see a regime shift marked by sustained inflation pressure, tighter liquidity, and broader de-risking. This environment demands careful assessment of portfolio exposure and scenario planning.
Periods like this can create opportunity, but they are preceded by volatility and uncertainty. The first step is to protect capital. The second is to identify where asymmetric upside may emerge once the market recalibrates.
I'm almost insulted that they didn't even bother to distract us with some kind of false flag operation.
Trump, the "no new wars" guy.
We are ruled by Israel.
Yeah, Where is the dinner and a movie before sticking it in the back door?
I remember reading about US strikes in Iraq as a kid. Now my kids are reading about US strikes in Iran. Going on 40 years since Gulf I.
Iran and Iraq were once the nation of Persia.
The British/west broke Persia up in order to better be able to divide and rule over the different religious groups and factions within this oil rich region.
The nation state boundaries of the entire middle east and Africa have been drawn up by the power brokers of Europe and the US on order to gain resource hegemony.
The nation state and its power projection capacity is the primary determinant of the wealth of nations.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/28/trump-us-military-iran-strikes-middle-east-oil.html
I would understand major combat operations as boots on the ground. This just seems like some strategic missile strikes and encouraging people of Iran to take over. we'll see, things can always escalate.
Trump is pushing back against China by attacking its client state- oil suppliers.
Venezuela now Iran.
China won the trade war- but USA is pushing back with war on Chinas energy supply and military proxies.
Nation state power projection is fundamental to the wealth of nations.
'Free trade' is an oxymoron.
Iranian media is broadcasting a video of air strikes near the Burj Khalifa after posting this threat to attack the skyscraper
Suspected insiders make over $1.2 million on Polymarket by betting on U.S.'s Iran strike
From SOTU (this week):
From today (same week):
‘Ended wars’ guy started more.
#1444669
https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/28/world/video/missile-strikes-near-us-navy-base-in-bahrain-digvid
A Critical Market Update on Geopolitical Risk
The geopolitical environment has shifted dramatically. Reports indicate that U.S. and Israeli forces have initiated military action against Iran, and there is credible speculation that this could evolve into a sustained campaign rather than a symbolic strike. Markets are not only reacting to shock but to the possibility of prolonged conflicta distinction with significant implications.
Historically, when geopolitical events extend over days or weeks, capital markets begin pricing in duration risk. This is different from short-term volatility and often triggers structural adjustments across asset classes.
We can outline three potential scenarios:
Both sides conduct targeted strikes, claim strategic victories, and tensions gradually ease. Markets recover after initial volatility.
2.Prolonged Escalation
The conflict draws in greater U.S. involvement, affecting oil production, shipping routes, inflation expectations, and defense spending. Broader macro uncertainty leads to sustained selling pressure.
3.Severe Disruption
Iran interferes with traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, which channels roughly 20 percent of global oil supply. Any disruption would cause a rapid spike in crude prices, driving inflation higher and forcing interest rates upward.
In the severe disruption scenario, rising oil prices would reignite inflation fears. Increased yields could tighten liquidity conditions quickly. Risk assets including high multiple technology stocks, speculative growth names, small caps, and cryptocurrencies would likely face sharp declines.
In such scenarios, markets do not fall because fundamentals evaporate overnight but because leveraged positions must be unwound. Bitcoin, for example, would not decline due to structural failure in its network but because it is treated as a high-beta risk asset. When liquidity contracts, investors sell what they can, not necessarily what they want to.
Current price action already reflects this risk premium. Brent crude is approaching multi-month highs, and shipping costs for Middle East tanker routes have risen sharply. These are early indicators that markets are preparing for possible disruption.
The bottom line: if the conflict remains short-lived, markets may stabilize. If it escalates or disrupts Hormuz, we could see a regime shift marked by sustained inflation pressure, tighter liquidity, and broader de-risking. This environment demands careful assessment of portfolio exposure and scenario planning.
Periods like this can create opportunity, but they are preceded by volatility and uncertainty. The first step is to protect capital. The second is to identify where asymmetric upside may emerge once the market recalibrates.