pull down to refresh

In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome.

AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems. The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement.

We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only.

We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements.

We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.

I wonder if this is at all connected to the fact that OpenAI just announced this AM that they raised $110b.

117 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 15h
I wonder if this is at all connected to the fact that OpenAI just announced this AM that they raised $110b

It's connected to #1444092

reply

Sure. By "this" I also meant that.

reply
167 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 9h

Oh! Well they definitely need money to beat Anthropic now. But look at whom they raised from? Oh my! Amazon and Nvidia. I wonder if they're going to buy services from AWS and some GPUs from Nvidia? lol

reply

This honestly feel like insider trading.

  1. Announce new round of funding
  2. Related stock goes up
  3. Raise money is from companies whose stocks going up
  4. Raise money goes back to investors directly via purchases

Just churning money between parties and causing market side effects

I didn’t check any stocks, just a hypothetical

reply
167 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 4h

It's more like this:

  1. OpenAI need cash for compute to make new models.
  2. Only can get 30B from softbank... not enough.
  3. Call Jeffrey tell him you wanna buy AWS credz with stonks. Jeffrey says fine here's 50B now gimme stonks and then you buy 50B worth of AWS credz from me.
  4. Call Jensen tell him you wanna buy GPUs with stonks. Jensen says fine, here's 30B now gimme stonks and then you buy 30B worth of GPUs from me.

This will only end bad if OpenAI keeps on not winning. Let's hope for Sam that he doesn't get disrupted by Alibaba or Tencent... or well... Enemy Of The State #1: Anthropic.

reply

"If the govt says you don't need a gun, you definitely need a gun" (maybe 2) :-)
They already spying on us, so why the facade? "Oh well, but now we at least told you we won't spy on you"...
One big farce is what this is.... imho

reply

The socialist government is micromanaging the economy and picking winners

reply

Sam Altman skipped the don't be evil step

reply

Also, @justin_shocknet beat me to it:

#1444334

reply
reply

I will admit that this today feels a little like a theater piece.

reply

It's all theatre. Even Anthropic holding out is theatre (imo)

reply
reply
41 sats \ 1 reply \ @adlai 15h
Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems.

... aren't these also what Anthropic wanted?

reply

It doesn't make sense. Domestic mass surveillance is supposed to be illegal. And what is the purpose of the surveillance anyway?

reply
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @Ohtis 19h -102 sats

I get the ‘serve humanity’ angle, but this is definitely one of those complicated moments.