pull down to refresh

I would zap him a few sats if I could easily see whether he has taken the trouble to attach a LN send and receive wallet but expect he has not as there is fuck all incentive to now that you have concealed wallet status by default.

There is less and less incentive for genuine Bitcoiners to join and participate in SNs using sats...and so the SNs economy is becoming increasingly saturated with inhouse CC tokens that are even worse than shitcoin- they have zero value outside of SNs.

Without input of sats (real money) SNs cannot ever achieve economic viability will surely die.

The privacy argument against attaching and showing wallets is pure BS - I can attach LN wallets without compromising my privacy and so can anyone else.

I attached a LN wallet first thing when I made this account

reply

Your profile shows a receiving wallet but no sending wallet.

#1441579

'I would zap him a few sats if I could easily see whether he has taken the trouble to attach a LN send and receive wallet'

reply
1222 sats \ 1 reply \ @StackerofZEUS 2h

Done.

reply

Some of what I sent was CCs but most or all of what you receive should be sats.

SNs as you probably know take a 30% cut of any zaps sent.

You are now transacting here on SNs as much as is possible on real money sats.

reply
51 sats \ 1 reply \ @Solomonsatoshi 27 Feb -100 sats

deleted by author