pull down to refresh

1 sat \ 1 reply \ @d680ecaa8e 24 Feb \ on: SN release: top/posts/<when>?by=downsats, partial not-custodial zap splits meta

If a person vote against a content he must pay money like pay 30 sats so 9 satoshis to the territory and 21 satoshis against content so owner lose 21 satoshis debited from his wallet attached or 21 CC so there will no be anymore aggressive downzapping becausse people think 10 times before downzap a content unlike downzap for free.

write
preview
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 25 Feb -100 sats

All my downzaps are funded 100% with sats (real money) and there is no monetary return to me.

Content providers can Sybil upzap their own content boosting its prominence and get 70% back- so there is already a 300% advantage for Sybil upzaps advantaging content providers over downzaps.

CCs are not money, they are inhouse shitcoin-tokens with zero value outside of the closed centralised SNs database.