pull down to refresh

51 sats \ 3 replies \ @unboiled 24 Feb \ on: SN release: top/posts/<when>?by=downsats, partial not-custodial zap splits meta

Out of curiosity: What makes a downzap aggressive?

write
preview
33 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 24 Feb

Opposes a consensus of stackers in magnitude and is motivated by something other than the content.

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 25 Feb -100 sats

That is your viewpoint and assertion.
Content sullied by hypocrisy is mine.
You are all rarara , free market rules moderation with money, until it doesn't suit your narrative and then you change the rules to suit.

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 25 Feb -100 sats

I have been down zapping content providers who post content heavy on Bitcoin/LN adoption and use, but who do not attach and show LN wallets- in protest against their hypocrisy.

@koob and SNs devs have abandoned content neutrality and adopted policies, stance and algorithm changes that side with and support the content providers who do not attach LN wallets and/or conceal them. Wallet status is now concealed by default.

The biggest downzaps in SNs today and probably in SNs history are today of my posts- the first of which explains some of my reasoning.

https://stacker.news/items/1441579

https://stacker.news/items/1441544