Like with all things, that extrapolation of the upslope fails to consider that fun isn't infinite (I hate this fact of life.) So there's a time when bigger=smarter, and there is a time when the diminishing returns on how much smarter you get for your bigger, and at that equilibrium, suddenly smarter=smarter.

We'll get there.

optimism

We were only scratching the surface when I was in college, but everyone imagined inference would be much cheaper/more efficient than it ended up being.

If bigger=smarter forever, edge inference will always be relatively slow/dumb.

tech

devs

Lightweight, in-process (embedded, sqlite-like) vector database

k00b

We were only scratching the surface when I was in college, but everyone imagined inference would be much cheaper/more efficient than it ended up being.

If bigger=smarter forever, edge inference will always be relatively slow/dumb.