pull down to refresh

But I think the point of their numerical argument is whether the poor making $30,000/yr today would swap with Mr. Darcy who by their metrics was earning an equivalent of about $15,000/yr.

I think the poors would swap with Mr. Darcy.

(Assuming I'm reading the chart correctly, which I'm not sure I am, given the strange footnote about 1798)

I don’t think that’s what they intend but the note is confusing.

reply

Yeah I realized it might not be an adjustment to modern times, but some comparison between Dickens' and Austen's time? Threw me for a loop because people usually are adjusting to today's dollars

reply

I see. I didn’t get why they were adjusting 1798 prices to 1843.

reply