I’ve been invited to a student radio show as a guest.
I work as a sound designer in the film industry and I live on a Bitcoin standard. The conversation will touch on my position in the market and how I see money today.
I’m curious:
If you were sitting in that studio, how would you briefly explain that today’s market is not truly free, and why hard money like Bitcoin matters, without hype, price talk, or ideology?
How would you spark interest in people who’ve never thought about free markets or sound money, but who will feel the consequences of the current system?
Short answers welcome. I’d love to bring some of your perspectives into the conversation.
it really depends how long your talk or interview is going to be.
if you have the time, I recommend including a bit of general sociological/archaeological history[1]; how human societies got from the point where outstanding debts and favors were simply remembered and passed on by word-of-mouth, through the emergence of various technologies [monetization of jewelry, written records, eventually currency that functioned only as such]. I think it's an important perspective when introducing Bitcoin, otherwise the problem of coordinating all of humanity with one financial technology seems a little contrived.
covering this in any significant level of detail takes time, so if you're pressed maybe at least mention that there is this background and you don't have time to go into detail. The most important point is how inflation of modern currencies dilutes the poor into wage-slavery, making the modern world with its cognitive dissonance in some ways bleaker than the less "enlightened" civilizations that preceded it.
I always liked Nick Szabo's blog post on this topic, and the Nakamoto Institute site has a copy of it: https://nakamotoinstitute.org/library/shelling-out/ ↩
Thank you!
To understand Bitcoin it first helps greatly to understand fiat.
Most people don't.
Explain how fiat money operates to give huge privilege to bankers and governments.
Explain how fiat money is created everytime a bank issues debt and how that debases all other fiat money within the same system.
Then explain how Bitcoin operates on a different program of issuance that treats all participants equally without fear or favour.
Thank you!
I like using Jeff Booth's starting point as my own: "The natural state of the free market is deflationary."
A short explainer why, ie. increases in productivity & availability drive costs of production down. And if you can get agreement on that, the rest follows smoothly.
The next question then is why, despite the deflationary tendency, do prices continue to rise for everyone.
Thank you!
Mention some of the best other resources (books, articles, videos) at the beginning and the end. Maybe middle too.
I'm also interested in more details on how you're living a bitcoin standard!
"Ok guys, tinfoil hat on. Maybe there's something wrong with the way money and banks work. You know the money in your bank account isn't yours and isn't money, right?"
Good luck. Don't envy you.
Thank you!
When silver runs up the U.S. mint halts silver purchases. (1980,2013,2015,2019)
When GME ran up, Robinhood halted buying.
The market is rigged against retail. Anytime they get ahead, the market intervenes.
The fed is printing 40 billion dollars between December 13th, 2025 and April 2026. That's enough to give every home in america fiber internet or terraform the Nevada desert into something lush and inhabitable (twice). Instead its being used to devalue the honest saver.
The M2 money supply quintupled during Covid.
AT LEAST 9 Billion dollars of fraud in Minnesota...
Hard to describe without sounding like a schitzoid, tbh.
Thank you!
Start with reading these simple points:
@DarthCoin refuses to attach btc capable LN wallets to his SNs account.
He claims to live on the BTC Standard but cannot even bother using it here on SNs.
@DarthCoin is the supreme BTC Maxi hypocrit.
Do not zap arsemilking parasites like @DarthCoin who pretend to be bitcoiners but who deliberately boycott SNs BTC LN circular economy.
Isn't there some chance the issue is not black-and-white?
I've not studied the new SN wallet mechanics in any great detail, although it does appear from looking at my own satistics page that CCs and sats get converted 1:1 by the new accounting mechanism, as necessary and invisibly unless you actually read the diagram for each zap. So while sats zapped to someone like Darth might temporarily be "trapped" in the site as CCs, as he keeps on commenting and zapping, they gradually get turned back into withdrawable sats as they accumulate in the accounts of people who want withdrawable sats.
All that aside, I'm not going to try outright dissuading you from your crusade, although I do wish you could include some more general educational links[1] in your comments, rather than only the ad hominem against Darth. This way, although you might not ever fully accomplish your main goal, there will still be a chance that people reading along for amusement might find useful and educational links and understand the site better.
I don't quite recommend the ones in the site footer, as they have drifted a little out of date by now; the two recent discussions that jumped out from a skim of ~meta were the announcement and this followup discusison. ↩
You raise an interesting aspect of the issue which I had not yet considered.
It actually makes @Darthcoins stance even worse.
When someone with an attached wallet zaps someone who does not have an attached wallet what happens?
The sats are converted into CC shitcoins.
As @DarthCoin has pointed out, the only way for these CCs to be converted back into sats is for the holder to sell them to someone for sats, which @DarthCoin offers to do as he claims to have a stack of them he has arsemilked.
CCs are shitcoins. The SNs operators can create as many of them as they like at zero cost while pocketing the sats that were zapped to the recipient of the sats.
So actually the point you have raised makes @DarthCoins stance even worse as he is supporting the greater issuance of CC shitcoins within the ecosystem and supporting that greater issuance by offering to sell CCs for sats.
BTW in this dialogue I have not engaged in ad hominen arguments but focused on the issue which is his hypocrisy in claiming to be a Maxi living on the BTC standard when in reality he refuses to engage BTC wallets here on SNs. Any criticisms I have made of @DarthCoin have been to emphasise and highlight the argument, not to escape or divert from it as an ad hominen argument seeks to do.
To call him an arsemilking hypocrit in this context is not an ad hominen argument...it is to emphasise the point being made by my argument.
In fact the hominen attacks have been from @DarthCoin on me because he has largely refused to engage on the facts and issues raised and almost entirely attacked me with ad hominen diversionary nonsense..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem