pull down to refresh

102 sats \ 4 replies \ @sime 11h \ parent \ on: Making Bitcoin Speak Human - Spiral Blog bitcoin
  1. It happens a lot, but It's obviously not ideal
  2. LN Address depend on LNURL, which depends on an HTTP server. DNS is a little more fire and forget
I don't like that it depends on things you don't actually own, meaning it's not entirely censorship resistant: a. The domain can be taken away from you. b. DNS records can be modified. OK, they mention DNSSEC, which I have zero experience so that angel might be covered.
The spec is more pushing BOLT12 without a webserver that is backwards compatibility to Layer 1.
write
preview
1 sat \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 11h
So a LNURL server depending on a DNS is not censorship resistant but a BIP353 address depending on the same DNS is censorship resistant.
I do not see the logic here.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @sime 1h
Never said DNS is censorship resistant.
Off topic, but using pubky for DNS is a censorship resistant (it's quite cool, uses DHT that the torrent network uses)
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sime 1h
Using pubky with LNURL would be censorship resistant. (I think)
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nevermind 3h
Agree
reply