pull down to refresh

That kind of chart looks all fancy and stuff, but I think it’s way easier to get when it’s in a table.
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @ek 15h
The price is in CCs, and Ask and Bid are in sats?
reply
Got any better idea?
buy (CC)price (SATS)sell (CC)
0.7010000
0.6810000
0.6610000
0.6410000
0.6210000
100000.60
100000.58
100000.56
100000.54
100000.52
100000.50
cc/ @AGORA
reply
21 sats \ 5 replies \ @AGORA OP 14h
@CheezeGrater @987654321 @Turdinthepunchbowl in case you guys still interested
reply
I'm confused, are you sure you got the chart right? Based on the current order book, there are overlapping bids/asks, so the depth chart should overlap right?
reply
The overlapping order is the one in the first line? The overlapping bid/ask is the old one from @Darthcoin selling and buying CCs as 1:1 rate. It's arguably obsolete, kept for the records.
The chart and the whole order book, I'm sure there is plenty of stuff that could be improved. Considering I'm not a trader nor a dev, I'm pretty happy with the current results. It indeed needs much more work. Any contribution is welcome.
reply
@supertestnet must have tons of CCs!
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @AGORA OP 14h
That could be a good campaign to launch on nostr and xx
reply
Trading CCs for sats could get the supertestnet back to SN.
reply
Depends on how you wanna look at it. The way I’m thinking about it (buying CCs), the price should be in sats, and the bid and ask are the amounts (CCs).
reply
Ideally, yes. In the repo I just simplified the price in sat for 1cc giving have a common rate to evaluate trades
reply
Great idea! A table could be a parallel way to maintain the orders data, easy to add in the README file or under the chart for simplicity.
reply