Travel enthusiasts who value authenticity may lament the infiltration of technology into historical landmarks as they believe that this dilutes the spirit of travelling. Instead of witnessing how life might have been in the past, they find that the encroachment of technology prevents them from immersing themselves in the charming and nostalgic atmosphere that would be otherwise evoked by these relics of the past. However, while the use of technology might compromise authenticity, it brings about other benefits such as higher engagement. Technology-enabled exhibits enable visitors to learn interesting facts of a landmark in a fun manner since interactive videos and colourful graphics engage various senses, enabling them to grasp ideas easily. This multisensory method aided by technology enables visitors to gain a deeper understanding of the landmark they are exploring. Kumamoto Castle, one of Japan’s top three castles, is a great example of how it has leveraged technology to transform itself. After a serious earthquake in 2016, the castle has rebranded itself during the rebuilding process, turning into an even more compelling attraction. Other than the interactive exhibits, keen visitors can download an application and use Augmented Reality to enrich their experience. Thus, I believe that technology and historical landmarks need not be mutually exclusive - and that technology can be used to enhance the appeal of historical landmarks.
pull down to refresh
72 sats \ 1 reply \ @brave 12h
Authenticity isn’t just visual, it’s temporal. The moment you stick a glowing screen in a 12th century church, you’ve shattered the sense of removed time.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryotosensei OP 11h
Wow this is such a beautiful argument. Thanks for such poetic and poignant words
reply