pull down to refresh

Lightning has incredibly strong centralising tendencies. Big well-connected hubs have massive advantages in many ways. Over time you will see a few very big Lightning nodes dominate.
Good point on marketing...
The moment you have multiple operators, I would say we're very close to self-custodial. You only need 1 single honest actor out of 500 in the federation.
I believe wallets don't have that yet as it seems like it's a CLI only operation at the moment. https://docs.spark.money/wallets/unilateral-exit#unilateral-exit
We are at the same stage in bitcoin development as when to send an email you had to write terminal commands.
Emails became widely used only when a simple GUI was available to all.
Better UX drives adoption.
If you can't receive while offline, that is a dealbreaker in many regions of the world.
We can't stop improving... even sending to a simple regular bitcoin address causes massive anxiety to anyone.
The UX is immature...
#1275977
Why would a nocoiner be attracted to use more expensive payment methods (Lightning) when in EU you have free instant bank transfers?
Different users have different needs.
Keep use lightning who cares. Others will choose what's subjectively better for them.
I don't think it's suitable for mainstream users. You can't even receive offline...
has it been open sourced?