correct, I have a difficult time listening to podcasts, and was hoping to understand the relevance of the title from the text.

Stereotypes always unnerve me a bit, because they often have some basis, then they get blown out of proportion, and sometimes they become self-fulfilling prophecies. As far as understanding women goes, I definitely am an example of the stereotypical man who frequently gets confounded by their behavior.... however I make an effort to consider people's behaviors as resulting from their individual situation and personality, rather than automatically writing them off as due to some stereotype.

are you aware of any efforts to provide alternatives?

obviously it doesn't take much of a coordinated maintainership effort for individuals to pick some old version and stick with it, although even publishing instructions on how to do this would help the people who have previously always installed distribution packages.

it's not "low hanging", the challenge is ludicrously difficult and honestly, I believe that however well-intentioned affirmative action efforts might be, they are often like feeding escaped zoo animals rather than rewilding from sanctuaries.

why the mysogynistic [clickbait?] post title? your text doesn't seem to have anything about women being inherently neurotic, beyond your impression of your Instagram friends...

uh didn't darknet markets already get along perfectly well with L1, and invariably get shut down due to opsec failures?

One good thing about it though is it was their spam implementation that fully unmasked Core for what it is, and Knots cultists as retards

are you implying neither camp is worth joining? [ an opinion I'd agree with by default, not being much of a joiner myself ]

beautiful photos.

I've seldom visited morraine valleys, so their scenery is a haunting contrast which I find quite sentimental.

super fond of Hazlett's One lesson book

yes! I recommend it often, even [especially?] to people who don't have the mental stomach for heavier books. The specific examples he lists are definitely dated, although the general message is universal, and honestly could be repeated just as well in domains outside of economics.

I think even @Solomonsatoshi would not vote for the option that indeed nobody voted for.

I try to visit that link posted I get this. It means my browser BLOCKED something suspicious,

first off, thank you for posting that; I don't even feel comfortable doing WHOIS queries without double-checking my network configuration.

Are you not even a bit worried about all these "analyzing tools" ?

of course I worry. perpetuating the genius of Claude Monet does, gradually, perpetuate the sophomoric delusion that particle accelerators will teach something significant about the world, rather than simply providing well-preserved samples of fine art as it was done by one of the greatest masters. does this mean the access to galleries must include mandatory lectures about metaphysics, geometry, and neurology?

taint has only as much relevance as merchants give it; unfortunately, the stinking cat is long out of the bag, and has been marking all over the chain, for well over half a decade. arguments like ours must be done anytime free "taint detection" services are advertised, so the merchants who consider paying for the "professional" ones understand how much of their budget could get wasted chasing these vapors.

do you believe in either?

why do you care?

good, you don't want the government performing a 49% owngoal while the hodlers of rice futures are still tripping over their own shoelaces

getting paid to re-read One Hundred Years of Solitude

[the book has one possible version of the trade you wonder about, and reading it once basically calcifies that part of the plot permanently in your wetware]

it has been less than one week since I awoke literally wet-eyed, and did not wipe, telling myself that the Iranian friend who has not been "seen online" for the proverbial two weeks might need the tissues more than I.

if angry matrons can talk about starving chinese children, can't I believe in an Iranian friend?

And we already know that, we don't need any mumbo jumbo analyzer for that, we use our brain.

obviously, patriarch speaks for family; however, some curious children, and nosy bureaucrats, do not have any sources of wisdom... neither family with domain expertise, nor friends with technological familiarity. for that sort of orphan, the site is a nifty little gimmick.

I hope @bithypha realizes how intractable the Hard Problem of Correlation gets, once you begin widening your problem domain outside of p2pkh or whatever was your first "complete" dataset.

Local shopkeepers basically became my offline Waze

yeah; if they weren't the ears of the marketplace, why would anyone believe that prices are efficient?

I have so many more questions for you, although due to respect for mental bandwidth and the risks you might incur each time you attach your digital hose to the server, I'll read a bit more of what you might have posted previously about your specific situation before bothering you with more effectively public chitchat.

How did the inability to use Waze affect your walking paths, during interesting times?

Honestly I didn't read the entire post in detail, after I realized I have a difficult time distinguishing which paragraphs are yours, and which were quotes. Regular markdown quote blocks, with a > beginning each paragraph or standalone line, should preserve any formatting within a longer AI response, while being clearer to your readers.

Maybe all the paragraphs after the prompt are from the LLM response, and only # headings are your comments?

As for the claim about "financial engineering", lots of collective worry ends up spending itself on accelerating the eventual efficiency of markets; it is no good if they are only asymptotically efficient, while being far enough away from any theoretically ideal value that the data become a haze of anecdotes. So it is logical that some economic effort goes "meta"; what worries me is when financial engineers bring to market some deceptively simple product [e.g., MSTR can be bought and sold like any ticker] which might influence "followy" liquidity the way any rattle lures children, while the leading liquidity reacts to externalities in qualitatively different ways than it does in e.g. commodities [which at their simplest aren't even a financial product, just literal stuff with physical bounds on its behavior].

tl;dr I don't like the hype that developed around MSTR, despite still respecting their general effort

I have a range of behaviors. The availability heuristic makes it difficult to honestly self-evaluate my offline behavior.

When some might call my behavior introverted, my subjective experience is more one of not wanting to interfere, while also valuing my independent understanding or competence... it's rarely a deliberate introspection.

I didn't really phrase my point well. There are multiple ways to care about sports... specific sports? specific groups? recurring events?

Appreciation of the importance of athleticism is probably closest to caring about specific events [and their recurrence, rather than simply liking the rules of some sport without worrying how often they are tested]. It's a little similar to "belief in belief" devoid of opinion about which specific day the community congregates.