pull down to refresh
Good to know about this scam but I wouldn’t ever install Zoom on any of my computers so I guess I am immune to everything downstream of that single action.
I’ve had this idea for quite a while, and I think it is absolutely going to be great for locally managing communities.
People will need to be very involved in how the code runs and the ethos behind the code itself.
Obviously, an AI cannot enforce any rules in the real world, but I think it’s a great baseline system that will be a lot more transparent and accountable than a centralized judge.
What are you talking about?
Bitcoin is up substantially over the 200 week moving average.
Patience is the way.
Totally, Tatum.
I would like to find a way to get one of these into a museum if I can find one that displays old bitcoin miners.
How many are you looking for?
Personally, I don’t need a third party but let me give you an example of what I am asking.
I have been the victim of fraud in the past.
A past employer forged my signature on a paper contract to pressure me to do something that wasn’t in my original employment contract. They tried to add to my job description without a pay raise.
I cited my Docusign contract as the only viable contract and what I would use if I needed to take legal action against the company. Some corrupt employees loyal to management said they would lie in court and claim they witnessed me sign the paper contract.
In my case, the Docusign contract was all I had as any proof on my end. I’m just wondering if this contract service would also somehow stand up in court if I had to take legal action.
I guess what I’m wondering is…
whether or not any court would uphold a signature from some random service OR does Docusign have some special sauce that makes it legit.
According to AI…
“A DocuSign agreement becomes legally binding through electronic signatures backed by laws like the U.S. E-Sign Act and ESIGN, which treat digital signatures the same as handwritten ones if intent to sign is clear.”
Probably has more to do with your ability to prove that whatever key signed the contract is controlled by the party who claims to have signed the contract.
That’s exactly what I’m thinking. Would be awesome for small agreements amongst Bitcoiners but could it be used for actual legal disputes if parties can’t prove they are the ones who signed.
I prefer using Start9 but some people on here might advise you to run Core or Knots without a “node in a box” service.
Are these signatures somehow legally binding?
This seems great for p2p where trust is high amongst peers but would this work for an actual employment contract or something more complex like legal agreements?
I would love to spend bitcoin amongst Bitcoiners but don’t know many.
Until enough people actively want (my) bitcoin as payment, I’ll just use it for apex savings.
Sending Bitcoin from a custodial Coinbase wallet to a custodial RobinHood wallet is turbo gay but probably still the fastest way to move money between large custodians because fiat is so slow.
Thanks so much for the reply.
I am looking forward to those infrastructure updates because Rizful is amazing.