pull down to refresh
@optimism
988,897 sats stacked
stacking since: #879734longest cowboy streak: 219npub13wvyk...hhes6rk47y
177 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 7h \ on: OpenAI, Anthropic, and Block join new Linux Foundation | TechCrunch AI
It's capture: you formalize open source frameworks then you have to worry less about disruption.
I should use "you", and ask please. Because that's probably what training does.
However, I just bark orders.
I'm of the opinion that they're exactly the same. Your coins, my coins, satoshi's coins, scammer's coins, thieves' coins, even Saylor's coins.
But if in the end Satoshi's coins will be frozen, let's just freeze Saylor's and Blackrock's too. Would be much funnier.
What if satoshi wants to spend their coins?
Not your keys, not your coins means that you don't get to make decisions over coins that you don't have the keys for. If you do have the keys,
OP_RETURN is a great unspendable output, I hear.Yes, what I mean is that if the utxoset size is an issue for you, then:
If you are worried about the utxoset and you're not mining,
utreexo is a better solution. If you run libbitcoin you don't care about it at all because you basically run full txindex. If you are a miner then don't mine what you don't like. And if you are worried about other miners, buy more ASICs until they are all bankrupt.The
utxo set is an implementation choice. Ask Voskuil why libbitcoin doesn't have it, or ask utreexo about their solution.It’s based on data from GOBankingRates, which uses publicly available federal datasets such as those from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Affairs, and the U.S. Census American Consumer Survey to do the calculations.
When I read this, the thing that immediately came to mind was: Lies, damned lies, and statistics. ~lol
101 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 8 Dec \ parent \ on: Do you prefer ebooks over books? BooksAndArticles
Paying for it is
honoring v4v, I think. Can even just read the online version and then pay for the ebook as a zap.Not just by the state either. What I find most cringe about the whole smart contract thing is that somehow, the financialization people have been very successful in capturing blockchain away from the honest use-case it was envisioned for. Shackles can be made out of freedomtech too.
I think that from that declaration linked there, the most important part that negates my question fully, in combination with your assertion of applicability, is:
ARTICLE 3. The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states. Even before recognition the state has the right to defend its integrity and independence, to provide for its conservation and prosperity ...