As I see it, you're not truly interested in the topics you start and it seems you're stuck in endless mental exercises. From experience (believe me) I know that's not a fun way to live life and it's hard to get out of that from within that framework. So yes I said something that was a little challenging.
Reading your responses, my take could be right on the money, but who knows. In the end only you.
Be well.
And as I see it, you think that you're able to create a profile about people based on some posts, of which some are serious, and some are simply to get people involved.
Stop forcing your view onto people, you're neither helpful, nor wanted.
reply
So a post like this is not serious but 'just to get people involved'. It reads pretty serious, I wonder if people realize it's not.
Anyway, turns out I was right then: you're not truly interested. The internet doesn't need people to post things to 'get them involved', you're wasting peoples time and trying to earn sats with your bs stories.
reply
Says who? You? Sure, enables you to make some kind of point, ain't it?
Posts like the one in question are of serious nature, but posts like "What technological innovation will usher in a new golden age" are the kind which aim to get people involved.
The fact that I even have to be this clear shows that you're pursuing something other than "keeping order on SN"...
You're desperately trying to create a case against me, but I don't know why.
Did I hurt your feelings sometime in the past?
reply
Haha, no I'm good man, don't worry. You do you. It's good to realize SN isn't for me, the incentives don't promote quality content.
reply
Nah, you're not "good", man, you're someone who runs his mouth based on loose assumptions, only to start pointing fingers at "SN" as the over coupling problem once the kick back gets too big.
The only problem here are you, don't like it, don't buy it.
Bye.
reply