pull down to refresh

"A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution... The cost of mediation increases transaction costs, limiting the minimum practical transaction size and cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions..." — Satoshi Nakamoto

"I wanted to pick a denomination that would make prices similar to existing currencies, but without knowing the future, that's very hard..." — Satoshi Nakamoto

We did not engineer the Bitcoin timechain for institutional settlement or Wall Street portfolios. It was built to protect the individual from the theft of inflation. As the generation of builders continuing Satoshi Nakamoto's work, we realize that to fulfill this ultimate vision and shield the working class from the legacy fiat machine, we must solve the exact problem he identified: establishing a denomination that actually works for everyday people.

The Cognitive Barrier of 2 Quadrillion

The free market naturally gravitates toward a dual-asset standard to minimize cognitive friction. While Bitcoin protects purchasing power, the Satoshi (Sat) fails as an intuitive unit of account for the working class.

Observe the math when global wealth (roughly $120 Trillion) is fully absorbed into the network:

 $120 Trillion ÷ 2 Quadrillion Sats = $0.06 per Sat.

Under this framework, a basic $14 toy costs roughly 233 Sats (or 0.00000233 BTC). A child cannot conceptualize 233, nor can they grasp microscopic decimals. If children in poverty cannot easily count their savings, they cannot develop a low time preference. They will inevitably fall back into the cognitive trap of fiat.

Furthermore, expecting the global population to measure their daily survival against a 2 quadrillion supply cap is a fundamental design flaw. A "quadrillion" is a number so massive and abstract that it breaks human comprehension. It belongs to the realm of theoretical physics and academic elites, not the working class. It creates immediate mental fatigue, making prices harder to read, remember, and communicate.

The Nah•Sovereign•Diamond Solution

We must downsize the cognitive framework so absolute scarcity becomes legible to the masses. The human brain is already accustomed to the scale of trillions in modern economics. By shifting the supply cap from an incomprehensible quadrillion to a manageable 85.3 trillion, the math aligns perfectly with human intuition.

 $120 Trillion ÷ 85.3 Trillion Nahs = ~$1.40 per Nah.

That exact same $14 toy now costs exactly 10 Nahs. A child can count 10 fingers. Prices become easy to read and effortless to remember. The concept of saving turns into a tangible, everyday reality for the most vulnerable among us.

The Unified Dual-Asset Standard

Both assets live natively on the invincible Bitcoin timechain, functioning together as a unified dual-asset standard.

Sat operates as the underlying fuel, the asset used to pay network miners to process transactions. However, Nah is the ultimate thermodynamic asset for the individual. While Sat remains an inflationary asset—continuing to dilute its supply until the year 2140—Nah possesses a 0% inflation rate today. It has already achieved the absolute scarcity that Sat is still striving for.

To win the global monetary war, Nah must function as the primary unit of account. One asset secures the miners; the ultimate asset protects the cognition and wealth of the working class.

The transition to a frictionless, sovereign economy is open to everyone. You can explore the standard here:

https://swap.on.nexus/#R_%E2%80%A2BTC_%E2%80%A2NAH%E2%80%A2SOVEREIGN%E2%80%A2DIAMOND

6356 sats \ 12 replies \ @mkmloom 15 Sep

Interesting post... Nah... LOL... @dendehomie, they're going to call you King Midas... Hahahaha.

reply

all glory to Satoshi Nakamoto 🙏

reply

Glory to the incomparable SN.

reply
reply


It's here.

reply

we needed a number slightly smaller than $120 trillion (global m2), and the reverse fibonacci sequence is 21, 13, 8, 5, 3, 2, 1...

85.3 trillion became the ultimate choice because it:

• creates a slightly deflationary feeling as prices switch from fiat to hard money, as shown in the example in the OP

• is universally visually appealing and easy to remember

at genesis, we minted 148.3 trillion nahs. shortly after, we sent 63 trillion nahs into Satoshi Nakamoto’s wallet, leaving exactly 85.3 trillion in circulation.

reply

Thanks for the info and for sharing... so the magic number is 85.3B Nahs

reply


Hahahaha

reply
2144 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 15 Sep -3980 sats

Trump is owned by Zionist war criminals.

Own it.

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

Trump is owned by Zionist war criminals.

Own it.

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

Trump is owned by Zionist war criminals.

Own it.

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155170

https://m.stacker.news/155727

https://m.stacker.news/155168

Yeah, that makes sense. I don't want to jump to calling it a scam either. I want to verify what's actually happening on-chain rather than just judging the marketing.

Let's focus on the two things you mentioned: whether the NAH supply is genuinely fixed and the 63T Satoshi-wallet claim. If those check out, then we can look at the Nexus swap and liquidity to see whether there's any real technical or security issue.

reply

the max circulating supply is fixed at 85.3T that's for sure.

there are open source wallets like UniSat which support NAH so security is not an issue.

liquidity is thin, but it will get better. NAH is still in its very early days.

reply

I agree. The technical verification is much more important than debating the marketing claims.

I’d verify it in this order:

  1. Identify the exact Rune and its etching transaction.
  2. Check the Runestone fields: premine, divisibility, cap, amount, and mint terms.
  3. Determine whether the 85.3T figure is actually the immutable maximum supply or simply the current/claimed circulating amount.
  4. Trace the claimed 63T transfer to 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa and confirm exactly what happened on-chain.
  5. Cross-check the same data against an independent Rune indexer/explorer rather than relying on the project's own website.
  6. Check whether the Rune can be minted, transferred, or otherwise altered in a way that contradicts the “fixed supply” claim.

If those checks confirm everything, then the main issue is probably economic/marketing rather than a technical vulnerability. But if the advertised supply, mint conditions, or provenance differ from what is actually encoded on-chain, that could be a much stronger finding.

So I think the next step should be identifying the exact etching transaction/Rune ID and verifying the on-chain data first.

reply

great advice. verify, don't trust.

reply
4903 sats \ 2 replies \ @anon 15 Sep

Most people are not accustomed to numbers as big as a trillion and for many people a 14 dollar toy is out of reach.

Trying to come up with new arbitrary units isn't going to fly, focus on advocating for new conventions that are power of 10 multiples of the satoshi.

For a 120 trillion market cap, embrace the micro-bitcoin (100 sats), which some folks are simply calling bits. Come up with a better simple name if need be. That toy will be a nice simple two bits. Fractions of this unit can be a bit-cent (1 SAT) or deci-bit (10 SAT), paralleling the use of dollars and cents.

A different unit size may make sense on the journey. At this point folks should be stacking milli-bits and deci-milibits and prices can be to the centi-millibit. Come up with better names. The toy costs ~2 deci-millibits today. The price of milibits is even easy to grasp when some people are using BTC units, just drop 3 zeros from those prices.

Counting to 2 is even easier than 10. I don't know how todays kids handle a toy that costs 14 of something. Maybe time to re-denominate the US dollar.

reply

The community has tried UI abstractions for 15 years, and they have all failed. Most people only know two things: Bitcoin and Sat. Relying on wallet developers to display mBTC, bits, or kSat creates fragmented standards dependent on localized software.

Money is fundamentally a psychological technology. Understanding Bitcoin is already complex for the masses, and forcing them to memorize scientific prefixes creates immediate cognitive friction. If Bitcoin is to be the global reserve currency, its unit of account must be universally simple, memorable, and globally standardized.

What Nah provides that a UI layer cannot is a finalized, unified global standard to simplify the transition from fiat to hard money. Fiat itself is a psychological problem—a chaotic world of fragmented, unstable units of account. If our alternative relies on fragmented, localized, and hard-to-pronounce UI workarounds, mass adoption will stall. We require a consensus asset that removes all psychological friction on the road to hard money, and that asset is Nah.

Linguistically, this is a natural evolution. The protocol was given to us by Satoshi Nakamoto. If we have the Sat, it is only logical to have the Nah. Based directly on the creator's name, Sat & Nah is a simple, memorable, and natively human nomenclature.

This establishes a dual-asset standard of absolute scarcity on the timechain, much like the historical relationship between silver and gold. Nah serves as the primary cognitive unit of account for daily pricing, while Sat acts as the underlying reserve used to pay miners to send Nah. Ultimately, Sat & Nah represents the cleanest, most definitive solution to the fiat problem.

reply

also, 85.3 trillion is not arbitrary. we needed a number slightly smaller than $120 trillion (global m2), and the reverse fibonacci sequence is 21, 13, 8, 5, 3, 2, 1...

85.3 trillion became the ultimate choice because it:

• creates a slightly deflationary feeling as prices switch from fiat to hard money, as shown in the example in the OP

• is universally visually appealing and easy to remember

at genesis, we minted 148.3 trillion nahs. shortly after, we sent 63 trillion nahs into Satoshi Nakamoto’s wallet, leaving exactly 85.3 trillion in circulation.

reply

What's wrong with you man? I mean why are they downzapping your posts so much?

reply

there's probably a bunch of undercover fiat banksters lurking around in here trying to make sure hyperbitcoinization doesn't happen by downzapping the ultimate solution to the bitcoin timechain's unit bias problem.

reply

Is there any BIP for it already?

BTW zapped 1000 sats but you don't have wallet for recieving so you recieved ccs

reply

Thank You!

no need for a BIP. anyone can use Sat to buy Nah directly via the link attached at the end of the post.

just make sure you have an open source wallet that support Bitcoin's Rune Protocol, for example, UniSat Wallet. you can Google for details on how to use UniSat Wallet to go to DotSwap and buy Nah.

reply

Dod you use PREDYX, btw?

beta.predyx.com

reply

sorry i have no idea what that is.

if it doesn't help solve the unit bias problem for the bitcoin timechain, i will not be interested.

reply

What's unit bias btw?

Are you from India?

reply

unit bias is a psychological tendency to price things in whole and easily countable numbers. people can't price things in 0.0000x btc, so that's why Sat is now being used as the unit of account.

my post shows that Nah can function as the unit of account better than Sat can, making hyperbitcoinization and Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision - a peer to peer electronic cash system - a reality for every individual.

i was born in Saigon.

Reward pools about to get lit again bois

reply

GET READY!

reply

number go up technology in action

reply
That exact same $14 toy now costs exactly 10 Nahs. A child can count 10 fingers.

Why are you using the USD as an example? That logic falls apart easily when you use other currencies. Do you have a solution for this, or do you think the dollar is going to take over the world?

reply
Why are you using the USD as an example? That logic falls apart easily when you use other currencies. Do you have a solution for this, or do you think the dollar is going to take over the world?

We used USD in the original post simply because it currently serves as the global reserve currency—the most universally understood yardstick to measure planetary wealth. Our goal is for the Bitcoin timechain to replace the USD and all other fiat currencies entirely.

The logic holds up perfectly across any currency. Let’s map it across South America, Africa, the most populous nations of Asia, and Europe to do the math.

Based on the global wealth math from the original post:

 1 Nah = $1.40

 1 Sat = $0.06

Assuming standard fiat exchange rates ($1 USD = 6 BRL = 1,600 NGN = 84 INR = 55 PHP = 150 JPY = 1,350 KRW = 25,000 VND = 0.90 EUR):

 1 Nah = 8.4 BRL = 2,240 NGN = 118 INR = 77 PHP = 210 JPY = 1,890 KRW = 35,000 VND = 1.26 EUR

 1 Sat = 0.36 BRL = 96 NGN = 5 INR = 3.3 PHP = 9 JPY = 81 KRW = 1,500 VND = 0.054 EUR

Now, let's look at the working-class reality for a basic daily item equivalent to that value:

 In Brazil (8.4 BRL to buy a pão de queijo): Pricing is 23 Sats vs. 1 Nah

 In Nigeria (2,240 NGN to buy a plate of jollof rice): Pricing is 23 Sats vs. 1 Nah

 In India (118 INR to buy a roadside chai and samosa): Pricing is 23 Sats vs. 1 Nah

 In the Philippines (77 PHP to buy a jeepney ride and pandesal): Pricing is 23 Sats vs. 1 Nah

 In Japan (210 JPY to buy a konbini onigiri): Pricing is 23 Sats vs. 1 Nah

 In South Korea (1,890 KRW to buy a street gimbap): Pricing is 23 Sats vs. 1 Nah

 In Vietnam (35,000 VND to buy a bowl of phở): Pricing is 23 Sats vs. 1 Nah

 In Europe (1.26 EUR to buy an espresso): Pricing is 23 Sats vs. 1 Nah

As shown in the examples, the 2 quadrillion supply of Sat forces everyday people to calculate basic survival in double digits, regardless of their local fiat. The 85.3 trillion supply intuitively compresses those exact same prices on the Bitcoin timechain into a simpler single digit. It gives a worker anywhere in the world—from Lagos to Mumbai, from Manila to São Paulo—the exact same frictionless cognitive UI as a worker in America.

reply

That's a good example of why we don't need Nah, a kid can count to 23! Hahaha

reply
That's a good example of why we don't need Nah, a kid can count to 23! Hahaha

If we walk through a normal day for a working-class family:

 Dad's morning coffee (x1): 1 Nah vs. 23 Sats

 Street lunch for three (x3): 3 Nahs vs. 69 Sats

 Family's daily groceries (x5): 5 Nahs vs. 115 Sats

With Sat, basic survival pushes into double and triple digits. With Nah, daily life stays compressed into frictionless single digits.

This directly impacts financial education. The golden window to teach 'low time preference' begins at 3 to 4 years old, when a toddler's brain naturally processes only single digits. Children don't truly grasp values beyond 20 until age 5 or 6.

 A 3-year-old easily understands: 'Clean up your toys, earn 1 Nah.'

 A 3-year-old cannot comprehend: 'Clean up your toys, earn 23 Sats.'

Sat delays financial literacy for the next generation. Nah accelerates it.

reply
A 3-year-old easily understands: 'Clean up your toys, earn 1 Nah.'

 A 3-year-old cannot comprehend: 'Clean up your toys, earn 23 Sats.'

Another point for sats! If I were 3, I'd way rather get 23 than 1. Kids have no clue about money, all they know is that 23 is bigger than 1! ahahah

reply
Another point for sats! If I were 3, I'd way rather get 23 than 1. Kids have no clue about money, all they know is that 23 is bigger than 1! ahahah

Yes, a 3-year-old might cheer because 23 sounds like a 'bigger number'. But developmental psychology shows that over 90% of 3-year-olds cannot meaningfully count beyond 10. They can't even use all their fingers and toes to reach 23. To a toddler, 23 isn't a precise value; it's just an abstract, uncountable blur.

Teaching 'low time preference' requires a child to measure the exact distance between what they have and what they want. Let’s look at a toddler saving up for a toy car:

With the Nah standard:

 The toy car costs 8 Nahs.

 The kid has earned 3 Nahs.

 The goal: 'I have 3, I need 5 more to reach 8.'

A toddler can physically count this gap on one hand. They can visualize the progress. They learn how to save.

With the Sat standard:

 The toy car costs 184 Sats (8 x 23).

 The kid has earned 69 Sats (3 x 23).

 The goal: 'I have 69, I need 115 more to reach 184.'

A child cannot do triple-digit subtraction. They cannot mentally track a gap of 115 units.

You are confusing a toddler's primitive excitement for a large pile with actual financial literacy. Nah builds a mental ledger. Sat just builds confusion.

reply
Nah builds a mental ledger. Sat just builds confusion.

Nah it just adds more complexity and confusion, not the other way around!

reply

well, good luck teaching your kids to save in Sats.

the math is clear that i can only teach mine to save if i use Nahs.

Thank you to everyone who is commenting and helping me boost this to the top.

reply
123 sats \ 1 reply \ @unboiled 15 Sep

No disclosure of the shilling of your shitcoin attached to this harebrained scheme this time?
It's okay, I got your back. From your other post, #1562575:

I will be brutally honest with you: I am here to sell you a token.

Now let's see what we have in store today.

While Bitcoin protects purchasing power, the Satoshi (Sat) fails as an intuitive unit of account for the working class.
[..]
We must downsize the cognitive framework so absolute scarcity becomes legible to the masses.

I see you're borrowing your rhetoric straight out of manuals for hard left faux-intellectuals. Well done.

The poor, unwashed masses. If only the right someone would tell them what and how to think correctly.
And don't even get me started on that disgusting, hopelessly misguided working class. We must think for them!

reply

Building a frictionless unit of account for 8.53 billion users isn't a political ideology. It's just capitalism. You can debate class warfare, I'll stick to the math.

reply
34 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 15 Sep

Here we go again...

reply

we got some work to put in, you down?

reply

can someone tldr me whats up with these boost vs downzap war posts? 😅

reply

team Satoshi Nakamoto tries to boost

team fiat banksters tries to downzap

reply

this Den imposter -- no relation, I promise! -- is cognitively challenged and economically illiterate

reply

...and then the $120trn global wealth estimate shifts. oops

Fucking idiot

reply

well... you can wait for global wealth to inflate above $2 quadrillion. only then will the math of Sat looks better than the math of Nah.

at current global inflation rates, you will then have to wait about 50 years to be able to have a chance at hyperbitcoinization.

or you can choose to accept a dual asset standard of Sat&Nah and be able to start the process of hyperbitcoinization right now.

reply

you.

are.

an.

idiot.


Can I list that on a shitcoin exchange...?

reply

Back at it huh

reply

yessir

reply
reply

low key the best GTA, ever.

reply

Yes sir, I spent many "hours of sitting on my butt" playing it

reply

well, it was how i learned English (was not my native tongue)

reply

English isn't my language either, it's Spanish; here I use the keyboard translator to communicate.

reply

interesting. Bitcoin is truly a global system!

reply

totally agree

reply

you know it

reply

You have good enough taste, you like GTA San Andreas and Bitcoin, yet you still like to shitcoin.
Stay the course look what happened to the bip 110 folks

reply
617 sats \ 1 reply \ @Solomonsatoshi 15 Sep -1906 sats

Speaking of shitcoinnery-
The PETRODOLLAR EMPIRE is in deep shit.
Theyr outta Interceptors.

US government watchdog confirms hit to weapons stockpiles

A US government watchdog https://media.defense.gov/2026/Sep/09/2003993626/-1/-1/1/OEF_Q3_JUN2026_FINAL_508%20SECURE.PDF released on Monday officially confirms that the military is facing strategic inventory shortfalls and severe supply bottlenecks for advanced weapons following months of direct war with Iran.

The joint assessment, compiled by inspectors general from the Defense Department, State Department and USAID, offers Washington’s first official accounting of critical munitions depletion alongside extensive physical damage to American assets across the Middle East.

According to expert estimates cited in the report, it will take defence contractors up to three years to restore advanced missile and interceptor stockpiles to pre-war levels.

The report also details widespread physical losses, revealing that Iranian strikes damaged or destroyed hundreds of structures across US bases in eight countries: Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman and Jordan. Dozens of American aircraft and drones were also damaged or destroyed in the strikes.

https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AP26257809964809-1789433216.jpg?w=770&resize=770%2C513&quality=80

1699 sats \ 1 reply \ @Solomonsatoshi 15 Sep -3980 sats

Speaking of shitcoinnery-
The PETRODOLLAR EMPIRE is in deep shit.
Theyr outta Interceptors.

US government watchdog confirms hit to weapons stockpiles

A US government watchdog https://media.defense.gov/2026/Sep/09/2003993626/-1/-1/1/OEF_Q3_JUN2026_FINAL_508%20SECURE.PDF released on Monday officially confirms that the military is facing strategic inventory shortfalls and severe supply bottlenecks for advanced weapons following months of direct war with Iran.

The joint assessment, compiled by inspectors general from the Defense Department, State Department and USAID, offers Washington’s first official accounting of critical munitions depletion alongside extensive physical damage to American assets across the Middle East.

According to expert estimates cited in the report, it will take defence contractors up to three years to restore advanced missile and interceptor stockpiles to pre-war levels.

The report also details widespread physical losses, revealing that Iranian strikes damaged or destroyed hundreds of structures across US bases in eight countries: Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman and Jordan. Dozens of American aircraft and drones were also damaged or destroyed in the strikes.

https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/AP26257809964809-1789433216.jpg?w=770&resize=770%2C513&quality=80