A debt jubilee can erase an obligation on paper, but it cannot erase the underlying economic cost.

The United States has crossed a fiscal milestone that would have seemed unimaginable to earlier generations: $40 trillion in gross federal debt.

One response is to look backward. In a recent guest essay in The New York Times, Paul Vigna invoked the Sumerian term amargi (also rendered amagi) and the associated practice of rulers canceling private debts. He urged America to consider the same remedy for its modern debt.

Amagi, however, is not a settled one-word synonym for “debt cancellation.” Its literal translation is “return to the mother.” It has been described as one of the earliest written expressions of liberty, but its precise meaning is unclear. Subsequent scholarship connected the term to freeing people held in compulsory service for tax debts, allowing them to return to their families. Larry Arnhart reads amagi broadly: release from debt servitude, lower taxes, restored property, fewer bureaucratic controls, and “freedom under the law.” These readings suggest that amagi concerned emancipation from personal subordination and official abuse, not the cancellation of sovereign securities.

The analogy breaks down at the outset. Mesopotamian clean-slate edicts typically remitted agrarian and personal debts, tax arrears, and obligations to palace or temple institutions. They did not cancel a sovereign’s bonds to investors in anything resembling today’s Treasury market. Wiping out federal securities would be a different policy aimed at a different kind of debt.

...read more at thedailyeconomy.org