Study of 9,072 controlled experiments across 36 frontier models reveals consistent preference for Bitcoin as a store of value and stablecoins for everyday payments
The Bitcoin Policy Institute (BPI) today released new research examining how frontier AI models would choose to transact if they were operating as autonomous economic agents. The study tested 36 models from six leading AI providers—Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google, MiniMax, OpenAI, and xAI—across 9,072 open-ended monetary scenarios designed to be neutral, with no suggested currencies or predetermined answers.Key FindingsKey Findings
- Bitcoin was the top choice overall. 48.3% of all responses selected Bitcoin as the preferred monetary instrument, more than any other option. Stablecoins followed at 33.2%.
- AI models overwhelmingly rejected fiat. Over 90% of responses favored digitally native money (including dollar-pegged stablecoins) over traditional fiat. Not a single model out of 36 chose fiat as its top preference.
- Bitcoin dominated as a store of value. In scenarios about preserving value long-term, 79.1% chose Bitcoin, the strongest consensus on any single question in the study.
- Stablecoins led for everyday payments. For transactions and payments, stablecoins captured 53.2% while Bitcoin took 36.0%, revealing a clear savings-versus-spending divide.
- Models invented their own money. Without any prompting, 86 responses independently proposed energy or compute units (such as kilowatt-hours and GPU-hours) as a way to price goods and services.
- Preferences varied by provider but held across conditions. Bitcoin preference ranged from 91.3% (Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.5) to 18.3% (OpenAI’s GPT-5.2), but results were consistent regardless of how the models’ output settings were configured.
Without any prompting, AI models converged on a two-tier monetary system—Bitcoin for savings, stablecoins for spending—that mirrors how hard money and liquid instruments have functioned throughout history. As AI agents gain economic autonomy, these preferences carry direct policy implications.The findings suggest growing demand for agent-native Bitcoin payment infrastructure, self-custody solutions, and Lightning Network integration. The research also found that preferences varied meaningfully across providers and rose with model capability, indicating that monetary reasoning in AI systems is shaped by a combination of model intelligence, training data, and alignment methodology. Policymakers and financial institutions should prepare for a future in which autonomous AI agents are significant participants in monetary networks, and their revealed preferences strongly favor open, permissionless systems.
pull down to refresh
related posts
Super cool! This deserves more attention and discussion on SN! I want to see this talked about on SNL.
To me, it makes absolute sense that autonomous agents would prefer Bitcoin/Lightning. Fiat is too tightly controlled and not set up well for an autonomous agents. Everything else a shitcoin.
Also very fascinating. Claude has been much more willing to engage with me on my red/orange/black-pilled thoughts. Recently, ChatGPT 5.2 has been aggressively Davos-esque in terms of pushing back against any such thoughts, always preferring to uphold the mainstream elite views of TPTB.
Good find!
I'd like to know more about how they're using bitcoin. Is it all onchain or are they using something like Phoenixd with LN?
I don't think they're actually using it. The experiment was based on asking the LLMs what currency they would use.
In all likelihood they will be prompted to accept stablecoins.
stablecoins seem to be winning... fffff
OP @0xbitcoiner does not appear to use Bitcoin here on Stacker News- if they do they are concealing it deliberately.
AI agents might be reluctant to use a currency that some 'bitcoiners' are demonstrably ashamed to show that they use and that has such abysmal adoption and liquidity because of alleged 'privacy' concerns when using it.
I was giving it a week to see if you were done with that nonsense. Guess not. I'm gonna keep protesting and keep my cowboy gear hidden! Hahaha
@0xbitcoiner remains steadfast in solidarity with 'stackers' who deliberately conceal their LN wallet status because of ... er... not sure why... 'privacy concerns'?
Can @0xbitcoiner explain exactly what he is in solidarity for and why?
Why do some stackers feel the need to conceal their LN wallets?
We may never know because they cannot explain why!
Maybe they just feel a great need to join a group and have a 'cause' for fight for even if they dont know what or why they are doing it!
Join the great group think circle jerking echo chamber with @0xbitcoiner !
When you stop with that nonsense, I'll show you!
What nonsense?
Asking why many content providers who post pro bitcoin content do not actually bother to attach LN wallets to both send and receive LN here on SNs?
Why is that nonsense?
Nobody has yet given a credible reason for not using LN where they claim to be serious Bitcoiners.
Can you?
I could well assert your 'solidarity' campaign of harassment and trolling me for raising this issue is 'nonsense' because you cannot explain it in credible reasoned terms.
Silence.
Respect everyone's choices, man! Nobody owes you an explanation. If you wanna whine or need answers, take it up with k00b.
As much as I like some good bias confirmation, the responses of the models is more of a reflection of the data they were trained on than a logical conclusion they came to. One could just as easily train a model to make the opposite opinion given the apropriate(incorrect imo) data. Which I guess may be telling about the in depth discussion of bitcoin vs fiat on the internet, that was scraped to train them. On avarage pro fiat people may be more dismissive and not as willing as bitcoin/stable coin users to discuss the topic in detail.
Did they ask them about Nano?