pull down to refresh

25 sats \ 1 reply \ @jasonb OP 3h \ parent \ on: What other rabbit holes have you fallen into? BooksAndArticles
There’s a sequel?!?! And it’s good?!
write
preview
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 5m
There’s a sequel?!?!
Yes, they did an exceptional job of combining The Thing (2011) running time: 1:43:00 min into The Thing (1982) running time: 1:49:00 min. The Thing is actually a 3:32:00 min movie.
And it’s good?!
For me it was because when you watch them back to back they flow so well.
reply