pull down to refresh

That's a weird graph.
Why include companies like Uber/Apple on the left, but only include internet companies on the right?
EDIT: Also, taxes are paid to the country the company is incorporated. Fines are levied by the EU.
reply
21 sats \ 8 replies \ @ca 15h
EU has generated higher income from discretionary, ad-hoc, one-off fines to American companies than it has generated from yearly regular European tech businesses.
reply
71 sats \ 6 replies \ @sox 14h
Probably because European tech businesses try to comply with regulations that protect EU citizens' right.
Probably because the American hyper-mega corporations think they can do whatever they want and get away with it. It works in America because lobbyism is practically legal.
reply
Shht, you're being too reasonable ;)
reply
40 sats \ 4 replies \ @gmd OP 11h
Do you guys think the $120 M twitter fine is protecting EU citizens rights?
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @sox 11h
  • blue checkmarks that literal bots buy: consumer deception, 9 dollars to be “verified” -> impersonation
  • opaque ads: no archive of ads’ content, who bought the ads, etc.
  • lockdown of public content APIs: and this is personal to me, because to work with X API’s I have to give my credit card; but this denied access to public data by researchers (transparency)
What worries me the most is that people are protecting a billionaire that hate-cried on its own platform. Hate fabrication just because said billionaire failed to comply with basic transparency.
reply
35 sats \ 2 replies \ @gmd OP 11h
Blue checkmark is not deceptive at all. Outside of the first few months of people complaining about the clear change in policy, it has long been clear that the purpose is to levy a monetary cost on posting to attempt to limit bots, similar to here and other older concepts on charging for email. IG now has the exact same thing. The old blue check verification system was completely corrupt and non-transparent at all, people paying insiders for checkmarks etc.
I hate half of the toxic stuff that's posted on X but it's the best free speech major social media platform and that's why I paid for a blue checkmark on day 1.
reply
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @sox 10h
Yeah, I didn’t like the previous blue check either. What prevents bots or deceptive profiles from buying a blue check? I mean the real problem is that you can now buy a blue check. There's no verification involved, and everybody can create a new disposable credit card if that's the verification
meta has been fined for that too, heavier than X’s fine
That's not what the graph says: it only includes European internet companies.
reply
Did you actually checked what the fines are about?
The ones I checked are really reasonable and I would actually highly prefer for those tech companies to comply instead of eating the fine and not comply.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 18h
Apple were fined around $2 billion?
reply
It's under appeal. They might not end up paying it.
reply
63 sats \ 0 replies \ @rblb 20h
EU is a pirate state that is stealing from everybody EU is great 10/10 would vote again (never voted)
this message was redacted by the european commission

this is satire, please random european bureaucrat don't sure me, i am paying a lot of taxes
reply
EU Fines Elon Musk’s X $140 Million Amid Free Speech Clash #1309900
reply
A continent of takers
reply
Just a tariff in another form...
reply
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 9 Dec
This is pretty wild. In the business of fining foreign businesses.
reply
We should be fining them for their cookie crimes.
reply