Only one of these can be true if you ask me but most people that oppose any reforms to US government vaccine policy hold at least two of these contradictory views, sometimes all three.
- Indemnity of vaccine companies from litigation is critical to avoid these companies being sued out of existence.
- Vaccines are safe and effective. People should get them without fear.
- The US legal system makes it hard for individuals to get relief from the abuse of powerful corporations.
At this point I'm surprised if people are unaware of number 1. Makers of vaccines are indemnified from lawsuits from people who have been damaged by their products. In a world where most people support individuals over corporations this policy stands out as extremely peculiar. OK, lets say that its true that the risk of litigation is just too big of a risk for companies to bare. I can get that. I don't agree but I can understand thinking that.
What I don't get is how you can say this and also say vaccines are safe and effective. If they are so safe and effective then why do the companies need this protection. Mind you... these companies pretty much single-handedly sponsor all media, online and traditional. If one is just a nut for not getting every vaccine that is introduced to the market why do we need number 1? If we need number one how can number 2 be true?
Now we get to number three. Most people I have encountered or listened to for any length of time on vaccines believes corporations have corrupted the government and legal system. While they hold this belief they also believe number 1. Companies need protection from the people.
This is one of the most illogical topics I have ever encountered in my lifetime.
I will add a couple caveats. I think it is logically acceptable to realize that yeah, there is risk in creating a product that may be safe but its long term consequences are unknown. And, at the same time think that most vaccines are largely safe and effective. That's not a position I hold but its not crazy. The problem is that the messaging from the system and the pre-RFK establishment is not reasonable at all.
During the Covid fiasco we were force-fed lies by Fauci and his clones at every level of government. He misrepresented the Covid shots as vaccines knowing it was a completely different technology. On the rare occasions he was asked pointed questions about the unknowns and risks he would come back to the bromide. Vaccines are safe and effective. If you believe that, fine. But these shots were are new relatively untested technologies. They aren't just a new formula. They are a new kind of technology. They weren't even classified as vaccines when they were being developed. This was done mid-scam to give the companies the protection in number 1.
Its wild that in 2025 these three things still are allowed to stand as legitimate beliefs held by the vax maxis. Pick one. Only one can be true. You can't have two let alone three.