pull down to refresh
Looks like your profile doesn’t have DMs set up, could you configure that or hit me on nostr so I can share privately? thx
sorry for the delay.
- pwa favicon works now
- pro modal scroll works
- login/sign still broken with content blockers on
also, not sure if this is relevant in any way but I noticed most PWA installs (such as stacker news) don’t share state (like the login session) with Safari, but btclyzer does.
Tracked down which content filter was messing the login modal: https://apps.apple.com/app/id1030156203
It’s a bit broken on iPhone/Safari, especially with adblockers on or when added to the homescreen as a PWA.
When I disabled content blockers I was able to sign up from Safari, but when I added it to homescreen the buttons stopped working again. Also it’s missing an app icon.
Back to safari, the get pro modal is too long to fit the screen and it’s hard to close (since the other button was unreachable and fat fingering the outside of the modal is challenging).
Regardless of the arbitration process, if I were the worker I would feel much safer if the backer’s contribution was already locked behind a smart contract. Could use Rootstock for that, I guess.
Funny how it’s always 0 or 100 when it comes to DHT, as in I’m yet to see someone say it’s just mid or ok.
Same goes for IPFS, which is funny because they claim to have solved all of the issues from DHT.
Sounds like the perfect use case for AppClip.
Which begs the question: why don’t criminals skip the middleman by using any of the supposedly anonymous shitcoins?
Difficult, but not impossible. You can already find circular economies sprinkled around places where fiat has met its ultimate demise.
I don’t think these people care to compare Bitcoin with their failed state issued colored paper anymore.
So again, volatility against what? Dollar price is volatile against gold, but not many people put it that way… somehow dollar is still seen as a a stable currency.
Without state intervention, fiat currencies would be reacting to market forces just like Bitcoin. This kind of perceived stability is most likely only possible under coercion.
Depends on your point of view. It’s not volatile for people living in Bitcoin circular economies, because having goods and services priced in sats at the very least places some inertia on volatility.
Many like to proclaim they are living in the Bitcoin standard because they can pay of their coffee using sats because of square or whatever, but in reality they are still living in the fiat standard, spending fiat denominated fractions of Bitcoin is not, IMO, “living the bitcoin standard”.
Same logic applies for fiat denominated BTC salaries, nothing more than a pair of bitcoiners settling fiat prices using BTC as a payment network, not as money.
I know there are legitimate reasons for all of this, the square merchants couldn’t care less about your bytecoins, the worker has to pay fiat denominated rent, utilities and groceries etc.
Though on that note, some would argue that “real bitcoiners” should be willing to absorb the opportunity costs when it comes to online services at least, ignoring the fact that running a server is most likely to have fiat denominated costs.
It’s not easy or quick to transition currencies without some central planner forcing everyone’s hands into unfair transactions, see how the Brazilian Real came to be.
I don’t understand it either. Maybe the way this dataset is sourced is biased against smart criminals who don’t get caught? I have no idea.
Bitcoin is said to have lost market share in the black market for stablecoins.
Now is that a good or bad thing?
Do you think this unfortunate event will teach people about the need for sovereign infrastructure, self hosting, high speed meshnets such as FIPS, Yggdrasil and CJDNS and p2p in general?
Or is the common sentiment “oh no there’s nothing we can do in case this happens again!”?
Take for instance this pleb: npub1xzs45n639h6hdttxhnpye2lcfeddlt3u2xl8zcvz07l9uy8tfpdqvxreq5
His posts don’t even render on Primal, there’s no error banner, disclaimer or placeholder, the app just pretends the events aren’t there, and that makes threads with this person look like a schizophrenic breakdown.
Amazingly broken UX. But more importantly, the fact that they do not disclose anywhere on the app that such blacklist exists (forget about being able to turn it off) is what really concerns me.
Yes they have the right to block people on their app but not the right to lie and deceive users. I’m pretty sure this violates both the NAP and some consumer laws but whatever.
Never thought I would live enough to see myself rooting for China. Guess mandarin will be my L3.